Welcome to Pilkipedia, Guest! We hope you enjoy the boards available for you to browse here in secrecy.
However why not sign up to the forum to browse the several hidden boards and contribute to our growing community!

The Official "Derek" Thread

A board dedicated to news, interviews and current projects featuring Ricky Gervais, Stephen Merchant, and Karl Pilkington.

Moderators: Gtpod, Barrylad

Re: The "Derek" Thread

Postby Lenny Bruce » Thu 13 Oct, 2011 7:43 pm

Nill Demand wrote:Really? I could've sworn it made me laugh...



Well if that's the level of your humour you should watch Mrs Brown's Boys, YOU would think it comedy genius! You'll have found your level!
Lenny Bruce
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011
Reputation point: 0

Re: The "Derek" Thread

Postby dunebug » Thu 13 Oct, 2011 8:11 pm

He's having a go.
I think you're looking for cookdandbombd.co.uk Len, being a right cund about peoples opinions has been done to death here mate.
No great life story, or love interest, just a dead egg.
User avatar
dunebug
 
Posts: 5792
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006
Reputation point: 1394

Re: The "Derek" Thread

Postby Tomkerr93 » Thu 13 Oct, 2011 8:52 pm

Lenny Bruce wrote:Who the hell is that?


Get out.
User avatar
Tomkerr93
 
Posts: 327
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011
Location: Canterbury, England
Reputation point: 96

Re: The "Derek" Thread

Postby Nill Demand » Thu 13 Oct, 2011 9:35 pm

Cheers for the recommendation, Lenners, this is bloody GENIUS!
I think the mailman thinks me dumb.
User avatar
Nill Demand
 
Posts: 8223
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008
Location: Howland Island
Reputation point: 3011

Re: The "Derek" Thread

Postby Jenson's Beard » Thu 13 Oct, 2011 11:05 pm

Nill Demand wrote:Cheers for the recommendation, Lenners, this is bloody GENIUS!


How dare you enjoy things that are beneath others.
"Do you want a sandwich? Here's a sandwich". And then next year "Can I have a sandwich?" "What happened to your brother?" "He died."

Blog/F1 Podcast
User avatar
Jenson's Beard
 
Posts: 5101
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009
Location: Waterlooville
Reputation point: 1496

Re: The "Derek" Thread

Postby Steven » Thu 13 Oct, 2011 11:32 pm

Lenny Bruce wrote:
Anti_Nora wrote:[

Are you Dickie Anderson by any chance?



Who the hell is that? In your world i'm sure that was incredibly witty and well thought out.

When this Derek nonsense fails miserably just remember you were part of the herd who thought it genius. Idiot.

Image
Chinchilla: If I had you as a son I would obviously be devastated.
Marsy: Makes me so goddamn angry I want to squish him.
Dam Helder: You make Stevey look like ScottHanson.
ScottHanson: Great hair, great lad.
User avatar
Steven
 
Posts: 6472
Joined: Wed Apr 8, 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Reputation point: 1550

Re: The "Derek" Thread

Postby EinHistory » Fri 14 Oct, 2011 6:26 am

Lenny Bruce wrote:
Anti_Nora wrote:[

Are you Dickie Anderson by any chance?



Who the hell is that? In your world i'm sure that was incredibly witty and well thought out.

When this Derek nonsense fails miserably just remember you were part of the herd who thought it genius. Idiot.


You don't know who Randy Anders is?!
"Everyone's raving about Galileo."
EinHistory
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Sat Oct 1, 2011
Location: Cess Ave
Reputation point: 4

Re: The "Derek" Thread

Postby SleepingBeauty » Fri 14 Oct, 2011 9:50 am

I liked that. Not entirely sure why. Derek is an odd character. I like him.

I'm sure it'll be ok in a whole series. I don't think there's been anything that Ricky has done that I haven't enjoyed, so I have faith it'll be good.
SleepingBeauty
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011
Reputation point: 0

Re: The "Derek" Thread

Postby chinchilla » Fri 14 Oct, 2011 11:52 am

i think everyone can agree with the truth of these two statements :

"in the wrong hands this could be an absolute disaster"

and

"it is in ricky gervais' hands"


make of that what you will....
ive finally got round to changing my signature...
User avatar
chinchilla
 
Posts: 11067
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007
Location: Surrey, England
Reputation point: 5497

Re: The "Derek" Thread

Postby ike » Fri 14 Oct, 2011 1:12 pm

You can almost guarantee, regardless of what/the general viewer think of the show, there's bound to be a shit storm of negative press and reviews of it when it first comes out, more than likely by journalists that haven't actually seen it.
kate_mckay wrote:Well you can wipe that lippy off love, but if you want to have a dragon carved into your arse then make sure it coils right around your body and is breathing fire out of your cunt.
User avatar
ike
 
Posts: 15154
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009
Location: Essex, England
Reputation point: 2662

Re: The "Derek" Thread

Postby Scotland Rocks! » Fri 14 Oct, 2011 2:57 pm

Look. Here's my point.

Some characters are funny for eight-ish minutes. They're ideal for sketch comedy. You can have them pop up once, like Mr. Show or Wonder Showzen would do, or you can beat them to death like SNL or Mad TV tend to do.

Then you have a character concept that merits about a half-hour. Enough for a sort of one-off. Golden Years was a perfect example of that. Does anyone here really want to take up the argument that that show, funny as it was, could "be a whole series in the hands of Gervais and Merchant!"?

It wouldn't be. Because when a character is the sole focus of a TV series, it rarely works. It either has to be an ensemble with LOTS of good character ideas, or a really strong setting. That's why The Office, and to a lesser extent Extras, worked. As good as the characters were, the magic was that they were given a setting in which to thrive.

I can count on one hand the number of successful films that have come from Saturday Night Live characters - and that's if I'm wearing mittens. That's 90 minutes. Derek, as a character, is ideal for a sketch - maybe, at most, a recurring sketch show character. But that's it. No matter how much you Smerch & Jervay it up, what we're about to get is It's Pat!

(If you don't get that, you don't want to know.)

This is the point when some dopey twat chimes in with, "Yeah, well...don't watch it then!" Thanks. I won't. Cheers very much. If others want to watch it, that's fine as well. I just wish the guys were spending the time on existing projects. I'd rather have half the product with twice the quality.

You don't have to agree with me, but I don't have to agree with you either.
I am familiar with the works of Pablo Neruda.

huitlacoche: my video blog series.
User avatar
Scotland Rocks!
Wiki Admin
 
Posts: 3754
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Reputation point: 3321

Re: The "Derek" Thread

Postby ike » Fri 14 Oct, 2011 3:07 pm

Scotland Rocks! wrote:Then you have a character concept that merits about a half-hour. Enough for a sort of one-off. Golden Years was a perfect example of that. Does anyone here really want to take up the argument that that show, funny as it was, could "be a whole series in the hands of Gervais and Merchant!"?

It wouldn't be. Because when a character is the sole focus of a TV series, it rarely works. It either has to be an ensemble with LOTS of good character ideas, or a really strong setting. That's why The Office, and to a lesser extent Extras, worked. As good as the characters were, the magic was that they were given a setting in which to thrive.

One point worth picking up there though; Has Ricky ever actually established that the show will be purely focused on the one character of Derek? I'm not sure what you're basing that fact on, other than the knowledge the show is tentatively titled after him. Blackadder was focused predominantly on the one character but still had an ensemble of other great actors and characters, do we know if this will be any different at this stage?

I'm not arguing as to whether or not this will work, as I said ages ago I can't imagine how Derek can work as a series (rather than a character on a sketch show) based solely on that one sketch we've seen. But I still don't think we know anywhere near enough about it to make assumptions at this stage.
kate_mckay wrote:Well you can wipe that lippy off love, but if you want to have a dragon carved into your arse then make sure it coils right around your body and is breathing fire out of your cunt.
User avatar
ike
 
Posts: 15154
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009
Location: Essex, England
Reputation point: 2662

Re: The "Derek" Thread

Postby What A Hassle » Fri 14 Oct, 2011 3:10 pm

Anti_Nora wrote:Derek's most recent airing,



Feels like Gervais is about 10 seconds away from saying 'I want that one'.

I would love for this to be good, and Darwin knows I'll watch it when it comes out, but the main problem I have when watching these Derek clips is it reminds me of the impressions my classmates did back in Comprehensive school... And some of those were funnier.
User avatar
What A Hassle
 
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed Sep 7, 2011
Reputation point: 118

Re: The "Derek" Thread

Postby Anti_Nora » Fri 14 Oct, 2011 3:35 pm

Scotland Rocks! wrote:Look. Here's my point.

Some characters are funny for eight-ish minutes. They're ideal for sketch comedy. You can have them pop up once, like Mr. Show or Wonder Showzen would do, or you can beat them to death like SNL or Mad TV tend to do.

Then you have a character concept that merits about a half-hour. Enough for a sort of one-off. Golden Years was a perfect example of that. Does anyone here really want to take up the argument that that show, funny as it was, could "be a whole series in the hands of Gervais and Merchant!"?

It wouldn't be. Because when a character is the sole focus of a TV series, it rarely works. It either has to be an ensemble with LOTS of good character ideas, or a really strong setting. That's why The Office, and to a lesser extent Extras, worked. As good as the characters were, the magic was that they were given a setting in which to thrive.

I can count on one hand the number of successful films that have come from Saturday Night Live characters - and that's if I'm wearing mittens. That's 90 minutes. Derek, as a character, is ideal for a sketch - maybe, at most, a recurring sketch show character. But that's it. No matter how much you Smerch & Jervay it up, what we're about to get is It's Pat!

(If you don't get that, you don't want to know.)

This is the point when some dopey twat chimes in with, "Yeah, well...don't watch it then!" Thanks. I won't. Cheers very much. If others want to watch it, that's fine as well. I just wish the guys were spending the time on existing projects. I'd rather have half the product with twice the quality.

You don't have to agree with me, but I don't have to agree with you either.



You need to tell Ricky all this stuff, I mean how has he got by for the last decade without your nuggets of wisdom?

You bloody genius!

Image
Anti_Nora
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011
Reputation point: 0

Re: The "Derek" Thread

Postby Scotland Rocks! » Fri 14 Oct, 2011 6:17 pm

Anti_Nora wrote:You need to tell Ricky all this stuff, I mean how has he got by for the last decade without your nuggets of wisdom?


Wow. You win. I mean, why have articulate responses when being snide and dull will suffice?

Image
I am familiar with the works of Pablo Neruda.

huitlacoche: my video blog series.
User avatar
Scotland Rocks!
Wiki Admin
 
Posts: 3754
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Reputation point: 3321

PreviousNext

Return to News

Who is online

Registered users: Barrylad, croney, RandyChimp