nicholls wrote:I expected a lot of unforgivable insults. Barely anything really. People are complaining but that's fine with me. I don't wanna hate him anymore. Go back to being old Ricky now. Sick of it.
I completely agree
Welcome to Pilkipedia, Guest! We hope you enjoy the boards available for you to browse here in secrecy.
However why not sign up to the forum to browse the several hidden boards and contribute to our growing community!
nicholls wrote:I expected a lot of unforgivable insults. Barely anything really. People are complaining but that's fine with me. I don't wanna hate him anymore. Go back to being old Ricky now. Sick of it.








Hollywood Reporter wrote:"You hired me last year knowing what you'd get, then you fired me when you got it. Well, this year you get what you truly wanted. And you definitely get what you deserve." Cheeky, that. Oh, you clever, clever bastard. Well played, Ricky Gervais. You got the Globes but good.









piqsirpoq wrote:(the irony of Ricky having a go at Bridemaids for its lowbrow sink shitting humour).

stjimmy wrote:I think He's been a bit hurt from a lot of criticism over the last 6 months or so. I think he watered down this years ceremony, partly subconsciously because of this. I thought it was ok, but I was expecting carnage.



Hamlet wrote:This bit from the Hollywood Reporter is an interesting take on Ricky's performance. A bit generous, but interesting.Ah, but there's something clever afoot when you think about Gervais' underwhelming performance. Think about it. Think still more. And now consider this: Ricky Gervais just Punk’d the Globes. He exacted revenge for the Hollywood Foreign Press Association making such a stink last year and taking the moral high ground, lambasting him for being cruel and petty, a bitter outcast comic among real actors and stars. It could be that Gervais' skin really is that thick and he didn't suffer their angry arrows. Or it could be that when the Globes realized it really did need Gervais because controversy breeds ratings and ratings keep you viable, that Gervais plotted his revenge.
And Sunday night he took it. He wasn't merciless. He wasn't outraged. Hell, he didn't even seem very involved or even committed. It’s as if he said, "You hired me last year knowing what you'd get, then you fired me when you got it. Well, this year you get what you truly wanted. And you definitely get what you deserve."
Cheeky, that. Oh, you clever, clever bastard. Well played, Ricky Gervais. You got the Globes but good.

CantSayBien wrote:piqsirpoq wrote:(the irony of Ricky having a go at Bridemaids for its lowbrow sink shitting humour).
I don't think he was actually having a go... He seemed to genuinely like the movie

stjimmy wrote:CantSayBien wrote:piqsirpoq wrote:(the irony of Ricky having a go at Bridemaids for its lowbrow sink shitting humour).
I don't think he was actually having a go... He seemed to genuinely like the movie
I agree, he wasn't having a go at the movie at all.




inferior ZX81 wrote:So, I'm the only person here who enjoyed Ricky's bits (not like that) at the globes?
It wasn't ground breaking comedy but it's not exactly the easiest platform to be on -- hosting an awards do and trying to fit in a quick joke here and there. I personally can't think of anyone else who would do it sooo much better than Ricky. People, off the top of my head, who would come close would be Stephen Colbert or John Stewart but...... :/. Maybe Zack Ghalagstehskus would be a good shout...



Registered users: ike, mars bah bah bah, Mr. Buttersbee