Talk:Karl's Brother: Difference between revisions

From [[Main_Page|Pilkipedia]], the Karl Pilkington encyclopaedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


SH, i need you as tiebreaker.  i, being a sensible and intelligent human being, vote the newspaper article be forever removed entirely.  KA, being a whimsical fool, thinks it's 2 legit 2 quit.  what say you?  [[User:Steve is King|Steve is King]] 22:15, 21 August 2008 (BST)
SH, i need you as tiebreaker.  i, being a sensible and intelligent human being, vote the newspaper article be forever removed entirely.  KA, being a whimsical fool, thinks it's 2 legit 2 quit.  what say you?  [[User:Steve is King|Steve is King]] 22:15, 21 August 2008 (BST)
Present the facts, let the reader make up their mind. Skepticism innit? There's no definitive language in the article. It presents it as speculation. A user can click on the link to the image and go "Nah" or "Hmm, could be". What right do we have for them to not make their own mind up and bury this enigma forever in the past?--[[User:Knockinabout|Knockinabout]] 22:33, 21 August 2008 (BST)

Revision as of 21:33, 21 August 2008

Could be renamed Mark Pilkington ? ArtVandelay13 15:12, 7 April 2008 (BST)

Is this front page news-worthy? Didn't we have one on Suzanne's head? I can't remember.--Knockinabout 15:58, 12 April 2008 (BST)

I'd think it was worthy if it was actually him, rather than some bloke called Mark Pilkington from Manchester, 99% unlikely to be directly related to Karl. Not that I'm skeptical or anything. SH.

i'm sorry KA, you know i love you, but that's not karl's brother. SiK


SH, i need you as tiebreaker. i, being a sensible and intelligent human being, vote the newspaper article be forever removed entirely. KA, being a whimsical fool, thinks it's 2 legit 2 quit. what say you? Steve is King 22:15, 21 August 2008 (BST)

Present the facts, let the reader make up their mind. Skepticism innit? There's no definitive language in the article. It presents it as speculation. A user can click on the link to the image and go "Nah" or "Hmm, could be". What right do we have for them to not make their own mind up and bury this enigma forever in the past?--Knockinabout 22:33, 21 August 2008 (BST)