Talk:10 November 2001/Transcript

From [[Main_Page|Pilkipedia]], the Karl Pilkington encyclopaedia
Revision as of 10:21, 11 November 2007 by JoeW (talk | contribs) (JoeW comments)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sadly, I did my bit of the transcript (up to Schindler's Lifts) even though it had already been done. Of course mine was better though, har har. If you're in on this one (SiK, Bender) I recommend fixing up the grammar and punctuation. It's atrocious. Also, get rid of all the damn parenthesis with stuff like "(laughs)" - doesn't quite work with the new scripting. Also, take out the dialog within dialog.(But still props to who did this. It does take a damn lot of work. I'm just OCD.)--Knockinabout 21:47, 10 September 2007 (EDT)


ooooo ... we really need to make sure we are not duplicating work that has already been done! what a frustrating waste of time. sorry KA.  :( but it looks as if you did well actually to go over it. i'll check my alloted section tomorrow and work on the grammar and punctuation. indeed. Steve is King 22:17, 10 September 2007 (EDT)

Yeah this is all a bit complicated, it seems that the whole show has been done before? Are there any parts that have been missed, also we need to get KA's section if it lives up to the grammer and punctuality better. --Bender32 12:40, 11 September 2007 (EDT)


KA, i'm pasting my bit here because i don't know if i can just put it right in to an already-formatted show or what (let me know). hope that's not too much trouble. i just don't want to mess up your pretty squeek script.

this is schindler's lifts, c.o.'s breakfast show, and polaroids.


Ka-kow, done and done. Mine and SiKs sections are up. There were 2 other transcripts like this that I redid last weekend. They weren't in squeekscript so set out to do that, little did I know that they were riddled with the same stuff this one was- and I fixed them. I believe Squeek converted this one himself early on, but didn't fix the grammar etc. The ones I did (and should be ok) are 24 November 2001/Transcript and 01 December 2001/Transcript. But don't thank me, thank my passion for changing all things not done exactly the way I want them. 17 November 2001/Transcript is still a mess like this one was with (laughs) and other stuff.--Knockinabout 13:06, 11 September 2007 (EDT)


don't thank you?! sorry, kid, but i absolutely must! somehow i didn't realize you did this (which is weird bc i obsessively check the recent changes ....) ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC. great great great work. to both you and your apparently independent OCD. in the meantime, let me do 17 November 2001/Transcript. you've done more than your share! Steve is King 19:31, 11 September 2007 (EDT)


Hey, good to see some people taking up the mantle of transcribing, after my early, apparently "atrocious", efforts. I didn't think it was that bad, but I guess I did miss a lot of capitals at start of sentences. Good luck with the rest of it. PS, if you're going to criticise, makes sure of your spelling - I think it should be British rather than American, given the nationality of the speakers. Cheers JoeW 10:21, 11 November 2007 (GMT)